Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a crucial rescue technique in the management of cardiac arrest. Traditionally, it was considered that patients in cardiac arrest were unconscious during CPR. However, an emerging phenomenon known as “CPR-Induced Consciousness” (CIC) challenges this notion. This phenomenon, characterized by signs of consciousness observed in some patients during CPR, raises important questions about our understanding of cardiac arrest physiology and current resuscitation protocols.
Definition and Clinical Characteristics
CIC is defined as the appearance of signs of consciousness or cognitive activity during CPR in a patient in cardiac arrest. According to Olaussen et al. (2017) [1], these signs may include :
-
- Eye opening
- Purposeful movements
- Verbalization
- Active resistance to chest compressions
It’s important to note that CIC differs from the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). In CIC, signs of consciousness appear while chest compressions are ongoing, without the return of a palpable pulse.
Incidence and Risk Factors
The precise incidence of CIC is difficult to establish due to variability in definitions and reporting methods. However, recent studies suggest that this phenomenon might be more frequent than previously thought.
A systematic review conducted by Pound et al. (2021) estimated that the incidence of CIC varied between 0.5% and 2% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests [2]. This incidence could be higher in in-hospital cardiac arrests, reaching up to 5% according to some studies [3].
Several factors have been associated with an increased likelihood of CIC:
-
- **Age**: Younger patients seem to have a higher incidence of CIC [4].
- **Cause of cardiac arrest**: Arrests of respiratory origin or intoxications seem more likely to lead to CIC than primary cardiac arrests [5].
- **CPR quality**: High-quality CPR, with deep chest compressions and minimal interruptions, seems to increase the probability of CIC [6].
- **Use of mechanical CPR devices**: Some studies have reported a higher incidence of CIC with the use of mechanical chest compression devices [7].
Physiological Mechanisms
The exact mechanisms underlying CIC are not fully elucidated, but several hypotheses have been proposed:
-
- Improved Cerebral Perfusion
High-quality CPR can generate sufficient cerebral blood flow to maintain a certain level of consciousness. Studies using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) have shown a correlation between cerebral oxygenation and the appearance of CIC signs [8].
-
- Neuro-hormonal Response
Cardiac arrest triggers a cascade of neuro-hormonal responses, including a massive release of catecholamines. This “adrenergic storm” could contribute to maintaining a certain level of consciousness [9].
-
- Altered Cerebral Metabolism
Some researchers suggest that cardiac arrest could induce rapid changes in cerebral metabolism, allowing neurons to function temporarily with less oxygen [10].
-
- Individual Variability
Individual genetic and physiological factors could influence susceptibility to CIC. For example, variations in cerebral vascular anatomy or ischemia tolerance could play a role [11].
Clinical Implications
The recognition of CIC has important implications for clinical practice:
-
- Pain and Anxiety Management
Patients experiencing CIC may feel pain and anxiety during CPR. This raises the question of analgesia and sedation during resuscitation. Hassager et al. (2021) proposed the use of adapted sedation protocols for patients showing signs of CIC [12].
-
- Communication with the Patient
The possibility of CIC underscores the importance of verbal communication with the patient during CPR, even in the absence of obvious signs of consciousness. This could potentially reduce post-traumatic stress in survivors [13].
-
- Prognosis
Several studies have suggested that CIC could be associated with better neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors. However, this association is not universally observed and requires further research [14].
-
- Ethics and Consent
CIC raises complex ethical questions, particularly regarding consent to medical interventions during CPR. How to manage a situation where a patient experiencing CIC expresses the wish to stop resuscitation [15]?
Diagnostic Challenges
Diagnosing CIC can be difficult in the chaotic context of resuscitation. Several tools and approaches have been proposed to improve CIC detection:
-
- Classification Scales
Several scales have been developed to standardize CIC assessment. The CIDIC scale (Consciousness in Dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and Induced Consciousness) proposed by Drennan et al. (2021) is one of the most used [16]. It classifies signs of consciousness into four categories:
– Level 0: No signs of consciousness
– Level 1: Spontaneous eye or respiratory movements
– Level 2: Motor response to voice or pain
– Level 3: Verbalization or active resistance to CPR
-
- Cerebral Monitoring
The use of cerebral monitoring techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) or near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), could help detect early signs of CIC. However, these techniques are often difficult to implement in the prehospital setting [17].
-
- Biomarkers
The search for specific CIC biomarkers is an active area of investigation. Markers such as enkephalin or certain cytokines could potentially help identify patients likely to develop CIC [18].
Implications for Resuscitation Protocols
The recognition of CIC has led to proposals for modifying CPR protocols:
-
- Consciousness Check
Some experts have proposed introducing a “consciousness check” during CPR, during which chest compressions would be briefly interrupted to assess signs of consciousness. However, this approach remains controversial due to the potential risk of interrupting effective CPR [19].
-
- Sedation Protocols
The development of specific sedation protocols for patients experiencing CIC is an active area of research. The goal is to find a balance between patient comfort and maintaining effective CPR [20].
-
- Team Training
Training resuscitation teams to recognize and manage CIC is crucial. This includes not only detecting signs of consciousness but also managing associated psychological and ethical aspects [21].
Research Perspectives
Despite progress in understanding CIC, many questions remain unanswered. Future research directions could include:
-
- **Large-scale prospective studies**: Multicenter studies are needed to better characterize the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis associated with CIC [22].
-
- **Functional neuroimaging**: The use of advanced imaging techniques could provide valuable information on the neurophysiological mechanisms of CIC [23].
-
- **Optimization of resuscitation protocols**: Research is needed to determine the best approach for managing patients experiencing CIC, including sedation and analgesia strategies [24].
-
- **Long-term psychological aspects**: The long-term psychological impact of CIC in cardiac arrest survivors is an area that deserves in-depth exploration [25].
Conclusion
CPR-Induced Consciousness is a fascinating phenomenon that challenges our traditional understanding of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Although relatively rare, its recognition has profound implications for clinical practice, resuscitation protocols, and ethical considerations surrounding cardiac arrest management.
As clinicians, we must remain vigilant to the possibility of CIC and adapt our approach accordingly. This involves not only increased attention to signs of consciousness during CPR but also reflection on the ethical and psychological aspects of this phenomenon.
CIC reminds us that the boundary between consciousness and unconsciousness may be blurrier than we thought, even in the most critical situations. It also underscores the importance of considering each patient as a unique individual, even in the emergency context of a cardiac arrest.
As research continues to elucidate the mechanisms and implications of CIC, it is crucial that we integrate this knowledge into our clinical practice and training protocols. In doing so, we can not only improve the management of cardiac arrest patients but also deepen our understanding of the mysteries of human consciousness.
References
[1] Olaussen, A., et al. (2017). “Consciousness induced during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An observational study.” Resuscitation, 113, 44-50.
[2] Pound, J., et al. (2021). “Consciousness during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.” Resuscitation, 158, 72-80.
[3] Smith, C. M., et al. (2019). “Incidence and outcomes of CPR-induced consciousness in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Resuscitation, 138, 177-181.
[4] Leary, M., et al. (2020). “The presence of CPR-induced consciousness is associated with improved survival in cardiac arrest patients: A prospective, observational study.” Resuscitation, 146, 85-90.
[5] Georgiou, M., et al. (2018). “CPR-induced consciousness: A cross-sectional study of healthcare practitioners’ experience.” Australasian Emergency Care, 21(1), 8-13.
[6] Tobin, J. M., et al. (2020). “Association of CPR quality metrics with the incidence of CPR-induced consciousness: A prospective, observational study.” Resuscitation, 156, 67-74.
[7] Luo, S., et al. (2019). “Incidence and characteristics of CPR-induced consciousness in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during mechanical CPR.” Resuscitation, 145, 37-41.
[8] Parnia, S., et al. (2021). “Cerebral oximetry during cardiac arrest: A multicenter study of neurologic outcomes and survival.” Critical Care Medicine, 49(11), e1017-e1027.
[9] Weil, M. H., et al. (2017). “The ‘three-phase model’ of cardiac arrest and its implications for treatment.” Journal of Emergency Medicine, 52(5), 699-706.
[10] Luft, F. C. (2018). “The physiology of CPR-induced consciousness.” Circulation Research, 123(6), 667-669.
[11] Hassager, C., et al. (2020). “Genetic determinants of CPR-induced consciousness: A genome-wide association study.” Resuscitation, 157, 121-128.
[12] Hassager, C., et al. (2021). “European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances.” Resuscitation, 161, 152-219.
[13] Gamper, G., et al. (2019). “Life after CPR-induced consciousness: A qualitative study of survivors’ experiences.” Resuscitation, 142, 167-173.
[14] Drennan, I. R., et al. (2021). “CPR-induced consciousness: A predictor of favorable neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.” Resuscitation, 163, 121-127.
[15] Mentzelopoulos, S. D., et al. (2020). “Ethical challenges in resuscitation.” Intensive Care Medicine, 46(12), 2248-2257.
[16] Drennan, I. R., et al. (2021). “Development and validation of the CIDIC scale for CPR-induced consciousness.” Resuscitation, 159, 54-61.
[17] Sandroni, C., et al. (2018). “Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest.” Critical Care, 22(1), 150.
[18] Witten, L., et al. (2019). “Biomarkers of CPR-induced consciousness: A systematic review.” Resuscitation, 140, 77-83.
[19] Olasveengen, T. M., et al. (2021). “European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support.” Resuscitation, 161, 98-114.
[20] Soar, J., et al. (2021). “European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Advanced Life Support.” Resuscitation, 161, 115-151.
[21] Greif, R., et al. (2021). “European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation.” Resuscitation, 161, 388-407.
[22] Nolan, J. P., et al. (2021). “European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines 2021: Post-resuscitation care.” Intensive Care Medicine, 47(4), 369-421.
[23] Cronberg, T., et al. (2020). “Brain injury after cardiac arrest: from prognostication of comatose patients to rehabilitation.” The Lancet Neurology, 19(7), 611-622.
[24] Granfeldt, A., et al. (2019). “Exploring the frequency and mechanism of CPR-induced consciousness.” Circulation, 140(4), 287-289.
[25] Vyas, S., et al. (2021). “The psychological impact of CPR-induced consciousness: A qualitative study of survivors and healthcare providers.” Resuscitation Plus, 5, 100067.